PURITAN NEWS WEEKLY

www.puritans.net/news/

03/08/10

 

 

CONFESSIONAL SUBSCRIPTION

 

 

By J. Parnell McCarter

 

Recently on an internet list someone proposed this position relating to confessional subscription:

 

> Parnell,
>
> To avoid going into the details, let's simply grant the truth of the three
> reasons you list below. Does that keep you from ordinary church membership?
> In most Reformed churches, an ordinary member doesn't have to subscribe to
> the confessional standards or endorse the actions of the presbytery. This is
> how it should be. The church ought not, for example, to require more from an
> applicant for church membership than a credible profession of faith,
> including a life free from scandal, so long as the brother does not bring
> dissention into the church (Rom 14:1).
>

 

I responded as follows:


Ben, I think we have a different view of communicant membership. Catechism must precede communion. (I would refer you to Dr. Lee's writings, for example, on that topic, such as his examination of Proverbs 22:6)

And what is that catechism to consist of? training in the Biblical confessional standards of the Church (ie, the Biblical doctrines outlined in the original Westminster Standards)

And is that catechism hopefully leading to communicant membership merely intended to instruct, or is it done with the view that the person catechized should agree with what they have been catechized in? the latter

So to be eligible for communicant membership, one must not only profess Christ as one's personal Lord and Savior, one must also profess adherence to the Biblical confessional standards (and that then allows proper self-examination for communion). For instance, if one does not adhere to a Sabbatarian view of the Lord's Day, then one will not properly engage in self-examination before communion with respect to Sabbath observance. Of if one does not adhere to the RPW, then one will not properly engage in self-examination relating to will-worship.

All communicant members should be full subscriptionists to the confessional standards, or else they are not yet ready for communicant membership. The difference in requirement between church officers and communicant members is a matter of degree of knowledge, but not kind of subscription. Clearly ministers should be required to know more about the details of and arguments for the confessional standards than just communicant members. But both should be full subscriptionists. In principle, one who agrees with the Shorter Catechism should be in agreement with the WCF, because the WCF simply fleshes out in more detail what the Bible interpreted by the Shorter Catechism implies.

The Church is to be the pillar of truth in the world (I Timothy 3:15), defending the Biblical doctrines outlined in the original Westminster Stds. That implies individual Christians have an obligation to join themselves to that body which holds to those confessional standards. If someone is the only one in one's area to have those convictions, then it does not remove the obligation to seek to be part of that body, and not to be part of a body which effectively rejects and denies those standards.

- J. Parnell McCarter
> FPCS
> GR, MI
>