RUNNING NEWS AND COMMENTS
Due to time constraints, I had to cease writing regular Puritan News Weekly articles. But in lieu of that, I offer this Running News and Comments webpage in a blog-like format.
With respect to the issue of the
http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssFinancialServicesAndRealEstateNews/idUSLI45257420091119
"he
was educated at the
Flemish Christian democrat...Van Rompuy is a Catholic and has often gone on religious
retreats in the Abbey of Affligem (Flemish Brabant)
to renew his faith and meditate."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herman_Van_Rompuy
"Van Rompuy
is a strong opponent of Turkey joining the European Union. In 2004, he
stated "
I think the EU is still on track
for eventually making the Romish Church the
established church of the EU and the Pope as its spiritual head.
And I think the
As explained at http://www.puritans.net/news/prts111909.htm , Puritan Reformed Theological Seminary (PRTS) is in need of significant repentance and reformation.
1. It would have been a dangerous thing to be joining Nadab and Abihu in worship with
strange fire. It would call the judgment of God down upon oneself to be
worshipping along with them using the strange fire. (And it should be
noted the judgment came after Nadab and Abihu did it but once, and we have the advantage of their
example, which they did not have.)
2. Musical instruments in public worship are strange fire.
Although the judgment of God upon infractions might not be the same as that
upon Nadab and Abihu, it
can be very real. One such judgment I have perceived in many is a
blindness imposed upon them relating to the Regulative Principle of Worship
because of their generally cavalier attitude relating to the strange fire of
musical instruments in public worship. And who knows but some of the
other problems in various denominations stem from this?
11/12/09 – Presumptive Regeneration, Baptism and Preaching
First, it is nonsense to assert that paedobaptism
is predicated on presumptive regeneration. Neither God nor Esau's parents
were presuming Esau was regenerate when he was circumcised. That was not
the basis of it. The bases of it were:
1. The command of God
2. The duty of a covenant head to dedicate and commit everything
under his headship (insofar as his station allows) to Christ and Christianity.
3. The duty of all to bow to Christ: Nothing is neutral, so
everything not dedicated to Christ is anti-Christian. Leaving a child unbaptized is effectively saying the child is dedicated to
rebellion against Christ (though I realize Baptists would not admit that).
Regarding preaching, man’s native and natural condition (no matter
whether born of a Christian parent or not) is depraved and in need of
conversion. The starting point has to be the need for conversion, not the
assumption of conversion. And even communicant members need continually
to hear the duty of conversion in the preaching, for purposes of
self-examination because we are easily deceived as to our true state.