By J. Parnell McCarter

Puritan News Service


In other Puritan News articles we have covered the significant Vatican influences over the CIA.  We have documented the origins of the CIA under the Roman Catholic Knight of Malta “Wild Bill” Donovan.   So now we should ask: what is the character of the CIA?  Does it operate according to the traditional Romish maxim, “the end justifies the means”?   Does it lie, cheat, steal, and kill- all in the name of defending such noble good?  And we should finally ask: does the Bible really support such Romish evil in the name of good?



The Character of the C.I.A.


Much has been written about the CIA’s operations, by insiders and outsiders.  One insider who has chronicled what he witnessed in the CIA is Ralph McGehee.  He worked for the CIA from 1952 until 1977 and now writes about intelligence matters, notably the

book Deadly Deceits -- My 25 years in the CIA (New York: Sheridan Square Press, 1983). He has compiled a computer data base on CIA activities. Persons interested may write to him at: 422 Arkansas Ave., Herndon, VA  22070.  (See http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/CIA/CIA_SOP.html .)  Here are some excerpts of what he has written:


“...it is essential to provide background on the scope and nature of its worldwide operations. Between 1961 and 1975 the Agency conducted 900 major or sensitive operations, and thousands of lesser covert actions. The majority of its operations were propaganda, election or paramilitary. Countries of major concern, such as Indonesia in the early 1960s, were usually subjected to the CIA's most concerted attention.  Critics of the CIA have aptly described the mainstays of such attention: "discrediting political groups... by forged documents that may be attributed to them. . . ," faking "communist weapon shipments,'' capturing communist documents and then inserting forgeries prepared by the Agency's Technical Services Division. The CIA's "Mighty Wurlitzer" then emblazoned and disseminated the details of such "discoveries." The Mighty Wurlitzer was a worldwide propaganda mechanism consisting of hundreds or even thousands of media

representatives and officials including, over a period of years, approximately 400 members of the American media. The CIA has used the Wurlitzer and its successors to plant stories and to suppress expository or critical reporting in order to manipulate domestic and international perceptions. From the early 1980s, many media operations

formerly the responsibility of the CIA have been funded somewhat overtly by the National Endowment for Democracy (NED)… The labor unions the CIA creates and subsidizes, in their more virulent stages, provide strong-arm goon squads who burn buildings, threaten and beat up opponents, pose as groups of the opposition to discredit them, terrorize and control labor meetings, and participate in coups…After the CIA's overthrow of Arbenz's government in Guatemala in 1954, the U.S. gave the new government lists of  opponents to be eliminated. In Chile from 1971 through 1973, the CIA fomented a military coup through forgery and propaganda operations and compiled arrest lists of thousands, many of whom were later arrested and assassinated. In Bolivia in 1975, the CIA provided lists of progressive priests and nuns to the government which planned to harass, arrest and expel them.”


What is in fact happening is that the right wing of the Romish Church has used the CIA to fight the left wing of the Romish Church. 


Retired Marine Colonel and ex-CIA operative Philip Roettinger has told of his involvement with the CIA.  Here is an excerpt of information from http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/CIA/Guatemala_ITTJun95.html  :


“Something has been missing from the recent press coverage of the ClA's support for a Guatemalan military that has tortured and killed more than 150,000 people.


The more enlightened pundits have mentioned that the CIA sponsored coup in 1954 destroyed Guatemala's emerging democracy and initiated a series of brutal military dictatorships. But few reporters have pointed out that U.S. acquiescence to the bloodletting that followed has been the rule, not a policy aberration. Since the '54 coup,

the Guatemalan military and the US government have worked in tandem-from the '60s when the Green Berets conducted a Vietnam-style war in Guatemala, to the '80s and early '90s, when the death squads operated with tacit U.S. encouragement.


One man who believes that this historical perspective should be filled in is Philip Roettinger, a retired U.S. Marine Corps colonel. Roettinger was among the handful of CIA operatives who in 1954 planned and executed the Guatemalan coup. In a remote ClA-built base along the Honduran border with Guatemala, Roettinger organized

and trained a group of rebels, who as he has put it, were "driven by the prospect of power and wealth, not ideology.''


"It was a classic operation that went off beautifully," says the 80-year old Roettinger. "There's never been another one like it, and I'm glad."


As one of the opening salvos of the Cold War, the coup that toppled the democratically elected government of Jacabo Arbenz was not, as President Dwight Eisenhower insisted, aimed at "preventing the establishment of a communist beachhead in the Western Hemisphere." It was a cynical manipulation of anti communist hysteria to

maintain the domination of a U.S. multinational, United Fruit, over the Guatemalan government…In a Los Angeles Times op-ed piece Roettinger warned that the United States was repeating the same mistake it had made in Guatemala. "As a CIA case officer, I trained Guatemalan exiles in Honduras to invade their own country and unseat the elected president," he wrote. "The coup that I helped engineer in 1954 inaugurated an

unprecedented era of intransigent military rule in Central America. Generals and colonels acted with impunity to wipe out dissent and garner wealth for themselves and their cronies."”


The CIA is also heavily involved in the world’s illegal drug trade. Alfred W. McCoy, a history professor at the University of Wisconsin, has written about it.  He is the author of "The Politics of Heroin: The CIA Complicity in the Global Drug Trade."  Here are excerpts from what he has written:


Throughout the forty years of the Cold War, the CIA joined with urban gangsters and rural warlords, many of them major drug dealers, to mount covert operations against communists around the globe. In one of history's accidents, the Iron Curtain fell along the border of the Asian opium zone, which stretches across 5,000 miles of mountains

from Turkey to Thailand. In Burma during the 1950s, in Laos during the 1970s, and in Afghanistan during the 1980s, the CIA allied with highland warlords to mobilize tribal armies against the Soviet Union and China.


In each of these covert wars, Agency assets-local informants-used their alliance with the CIA to become major drug lords, expanding local opium production and shipping heroin to international markets, the United States included. Instead of stopping this drug dealing, the Agency tolerated it and, when necessary, blocked investigations. Since ruthless drug lords made effective anti-communist allies and opium amplified their power, CIA agents mounting delicate operations on their own, half a world from home, had no reason to complain. For the drug lords, it was an ideal arrangement. The CIA's major covert operations-often lasting a decade-provided them with de facto immunity within enforcement-free zones.


In Laos in the 1960s, the CIA battled local communists with a secret army of 30,000 Hmong-a tough highland tribe whose only cash crop was opium. A handful of CIA agents relied on tribal leaders to provide troops and Lao generals to protect their cover. When Hmong officers loaded opium on the ClA's proprietary carrier Air America,

the Agency did nothing. And when the Lao army's commander, General Ouane Rattikone, opened what was probably the world's largest heroin laboratory, the Agency again failed to act.


"The past involvement of many of these officers in drugs is well known," the ClA's Inspector General said in a still-classified 1972 report, "yet their goodwill . . . considerably facilitates the military activities of Agency-supported irregulars."


Indeed, the CIA had a detailed know ledge of drug trafficking in the Golden Triangle-that remote, rugged corner of Southeast Asia where Burma, Thailand, and Laos converge. In June 1971, The New York Times published extracts from an other CIA report identifying twenty-one opium refineries in the Golden Triangle and stating that the "most

important are located in the areas around Tachilek, Burma; Ban Houei Sai and Nam Keung in Laos; and Mae Salong in Thailand." Three of these areas were controlled by CIA allies: Nam Keung by the chief of CIA mercenaries for northwestern Laos; Ban Houei Sai by the commander of the Royal Lao Army; and Mae Salong by

the Nationalist Chinese forces who had fought for the Agency in Burma. The CIA stated that the Ban Houei Sai laboratory, which was owned by General Ouane, was ' believed capable of processing 100 kilos of raw opium per day," or 3.6 tons of heroin a year-a vast output considering the total yearly U.S. consumption of heroin was then less than ten tons.


By 1971, 34 percent of all U.S. soldiers in South Vietnam were heroin addicts, according to a White House survey.  There were more American heroin addicts in South Vietnam than in the entire United States-largely supplied from heroin laboratories operated by CIA allies, though the White House failed to acknowledge that unpleasant fact.  Since there was no indigenous local market, Asian drug lords started shipping Golden Triangle heroin not consumed by the GIs to the United States, where it soon won a significant share of the illicit market.




Within a few years, the currents of global geopolitics then shifted in ways that pushed the CIA into new alliances with drug traffickers. In 1979, the Soviets invaded Afghanistan and the Sandinista revolution seized Nicaragua, prompting two CIA covert operations with some revealing similarities. During the 1980s, while the Soviets occupied

Afghanistan, the CIA, working through Pakistan's Inter-Service Intelligence, spent some $2 billion to support the Afghan resistance. When the operation started in 1979, this region grew opium only for regional markets and produced no heroin. Within two years, however, the Pakistan-Afghanistan borderlands became the world's top heroin producer, supplying 60 percent of U.S. demand. In Pakistan, the heroin-addict population went from near zero in 1979 to 5,000 in 1981 and to 1.2 million by 1985-a much steeper rise than in any other nation.


CIA assets again controlled this heroin trade. As the Mujaheddin guerrillas seized territory inside Afghanistan, they ordered peasants to plant opium as a revolutionary tax. Across the border in Pakistan, Afghan leaders and local syndicates under the protection of Pakistan Intelligence operated hundreds of heroin laboratories. During this decade of wide-open drug-dealing, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency in Islamabad failed to instigate major seizures or arrests.


In May 1990, as the CIA operation was winding down, The Washington Post published a front-page expose charging that Gulbudin Hekmatar, the ClA's favored Afghan leader, was a major heroin manufacturer. The Post argued, in a manner similar to the San Jose Mercury News's later report about the contras, that U.S. officials had refused to investigate charges of heroin dealing by its Afghan allies "because U.S. narcotics policy in Afghanistan has been subordinated to the war against Soviet influence there."


In 1995, the former CIA director of the Afghan operation, Charles Cogan, admitted the CIA had indeed sacrificed the drug war to fight the Cold War. "Our main mission was to do as much damage as possible to the Soviets. We didn't really have the resources or the time to devote to an investigation of the drug trade," he told an Australian television reporter. "I don't think that we need to apologize for this. Every situation has its fallout.... There was fallout in terms of drugs, yes. But the main objective was accomplished. The Soviets left Afghanistan."


Again, distance and complexity insulated the CIA from any political fallout. Once the heroin left Pakistan's laboratories, the Sicilian mafia managed its export to the United States, and a chain of syndicate-controlled pizza parlors distributed the drugs to street gangs in American cities, according to reports by the Drug Enforcement

Agency. Most ordinary Americans did not see the links between the ClA's alliance with Afghan drug lords, the pizza parlors, and the heroin on U.S. streets.


In Central America, proximity simplified the political equation. According to sections of the San Jose Mercury News story that the mainstream press have not contested, this "dark alliance" began in the early 1980s when the contra revolt against Nicaragua's leftist Sandinista government was failing for want of funds. In 1981, the CIA

hired ex-Nicaraguan army Colonel Enrique Bermudez to organize what became the main contra guerrilla army, the Nicaraguan Democratic Front. Bermudez then accepted funds from two Nicaraguan exiles active in the crack trade to supplement meager Agency funding.


In California, Danilo Blandon, the former director of Nicaragua's farm-marketing program, used his business skills to open a new drug-distribution network. Blandon allied with the rising young black drug dealer "Freeway Rick" Ross to convert tons of cocaine into low-cost crack for a growing market among the city's poor African Americans.

With supplies of cheap cocaine from Central America, Ross undercut rival dealers and built a booming drug business that spread up the California coast and across the Midwest. Ross and Blandon avoided arrest for years. But in the late 1990s, the operation lost its contra connection. Both dealers were soon arrested on drug charges. Freeway Rick started serving a ten-year sentence, while the Justice Department intervened to free the

contra-connected Blandon and send him home as a well paid Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) informant.


Other responsible sources have made similar allegations about contra involvement in cocaine smuggling to the United States In December 1985, the Associated Press issued a story about the contra alliance with cocaine smugglers. "Nicaraguan rebels operating in northern Costa Rica have engaged in cocaine trafficking," wrote AP reporters Robert Parry and Brian Barger, "in part to help finance their war against Nicaragua's leftist government, according to U.S. investigators and American volunteers who work with the rebels." As evidence, the reporters cited a CIA intelligence report noting "the contras in Nicaragua had bought aircraft with drug profits."


After lengthy investigations, a U.S. Senate subcommittee chaired by John Kerry, the Democratic Senator from Massachusetts, issued a report in 1988 concluding that "individuals associated with the contra movement" were traffickers; cocaine smugglers had participated in "contra supply operations; and the U.S. State Department had

made "payments to drug traffickers . . . for humanitarian assistance to the contras. in some cases after the traffickers had been indicted . . . on drug charges."


During this decade of contra operations from bases in southern Honduras, the region was effectively closed to narcotics investigations. In 1983, at the height of the contra war, the DEA suddenly shut down its Honduran office even though the agent there, Tomas Zepeda, had, in his words, "generated a substantial amount of useful intelligence" about Honduran military involvement in the cocaine traffic to the United States. "The Pentagon made it clear that we were in the way," an anonymous DEA agent explained. "They had more important business." As host to the main contra bases and the ClA's supply operation, the Honduran military, like the commander of the Royal Laotian Army and Pakistani Intelligence, were spared investigation of their involvement in drug trafficking.”


God’s word calls such activity as this an abomination.  God never authorizes humans or human governments to engage in such evil.  Rather, God calls for obedience to His Ten Commandments.  But that is something we cannot expect out of the CIA.


(Note: For more info see http://www.nancymatson.com/CLDWR2.HTM . )