Response
to Globalist Historical Analysis by J.
Parnell McCarter
Date: 08/06/16
Globalism
argues for essentially open borders and the moral right for the free migration
of people across the world. In the view
of globalists, race and ethnicity are simply social constructs anyway, so why
have nations with immigration controls, since all that really matters is that
we are citizens of the world?
In
contrast, nationalism asserts national rights, supports national immigration
controls, and rejects that race and ethnicity are simply social constructs.
While it is the case that all people descend from Adam and Noah, and in that
sense are one, it is also the case that God has providentially distributed the
descendants of Noah into people groups, each with its own characteristics. This is not negated simply because there is
some level of inter-marriage among the people groups.
A typical
argument of globalists in their refutation of Anglo American nationalism is
that Anglo Americans would have no right to be in
This
globalist argument is based upon a flawed analysis of history. I will for purposes here set aside questions
of European exploration and colonization of
From such
beginnings as described above, territory was typically acquired from Indian
tribes in one of 4 ways:
1.
Purchase of territory from Indian tribes
2.
Retribution as a result of war loss by an Indian tribe following an attack by
an Indian tribe on a white settlement.
The attack would then lead to a war, which in most cases ended in white
victory. As in many wars, the victor
gains territory from the losing party.
(This was how in modern times
3.
Settlement of territory which whites considered to be no tribe's clear
property, but which a given Indian tribe considered its property
4.
Offensive conquest by whites of territory clearly the possession of a given
Indian tribe, followed by displacement of the Indian people
The fourth
method of territorial acquisition is clearly morally wrong, and the second is morally
questionable. But globalists do a
disservice to the truth when they argue as if all territorial acquisition by
Anglo Americans in